our magazines so far
[1 [[2 [3-(a little below)] [4-in yellow] [5-pale, flower, below] & [7]x2]]]
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
. . Welcome to Back to the Machine-Gun, blog version of the Liverpool magazine.
. . New content has been loaded.
-- some poems and information from Janette Stowell, who has a book coming out →
-- recent work from various participants →
-- a slow form record
of the physical machine-gun →
-- a radio transmission clip →
E-mail submissions/enquiries welcomed: backtothemachinegun@hotmail.com
. . New content has been loaded.
-- some poems and information from Janette Stowell, who has a book coming out →
-- recent work from various participants →
-- a slow form record
of the physical machine-gun →
-- a radio transmission clip →
E-mail submissions/enquiries welcomed: backtothemachinegun@hotmail.com
To brighten the blog and your day.
ReplyDeleteA display of the magazines we have produced up to this date.
my favourite back to machine guns, in terms of covers are:
ReplyDelete1,2,3 equal good
4,5,7 equal failures.
But the interiors may be opposite
6 never happened or something. I never quite worked out why.
That is some first class swearing.
ReplyDeleteI think I like 1, 3 and 5. The 3 girl has become our unofficial symbol. Perhaps. 5 is clean and quite elegant. 1 is incendiary, as is more of the content. I always thought we would veer into this political violence sphere, but alas, it was not to be. Probably a good thing.
Viva la (mini-poetics) Revolución! (perhaps - this would be the English qualifier)
I like the fact that 6 does not exist. Perhaps we could make it in retrospect. Or it could be a best of. Or we could all die. Mayhaps. Perhaps. Alas.
I think 6 should be made as some sort of anthology.
ReplyDeleteI think violence is best done without politics being involved, unless you are violent towards a politician. Violent events are happning most seconds of the day and night.
I just realised what your profile image is. De Kooning did some versions of that.
Still the anuses seem peered at by cunty mothers. I can understand how this can hold people up.
I took this picture in Musée d'Orsay in 2006.
ReplyDeleteI like the way the little profile area put a frame around it.
Frame within a frame. An onwards.